A true hybrid image/package system

  1. Projects using rpm-ostree
  2. Getting started
  3. Why?
  4. Why would I want to use it?
  5. Why not implement these changes in an existing package manager?
    1. Filesystem layout
    2. User experience
  6. But still evolutionary
  7. Talks and media
  8. License

rpm-ostree is a hybrid image/package system. It combines libostree as a base image format, and accepts RPM on both the client and server side, sharing code with the dnf project; specifically libdnf. and thus bringing many of the benefits of both together.

                         |                                         |
                         |       rpm-ostree (daemon + CLI)         |
                  +------>                                         <---------+
                  |      |     status, upgrade, rollback,          |         |
                  |      |     pkg layering, initramfs --enable    |         |
                  |      |                                         |         |
                  |      +-----------------------------------------+         |
                  |                                                          |
                  |                                                          |
                  |                                                          |
+-----------------|-------------------------+        +-----------------------|-----------------+
|                                           |        |                                         |
|         libostree (image system)          |        |            libdnf (pkg system)          |
|                                           |        |                                         |
|   C API, hardlink fs trees, system repo,  |        |    ties together libsolv (SAT solver)   |
|   commits, atomic bootloader swap         |        |    with librepo (RPM repo downloads)    |
|                                           |        |                                         |
+-------------------------------------------+        +-----------------------------------------+


  • Transactional, background image-based (versioned/checksummed) upgrades
  • OS rollback without affecting user data (/usr, /etc but not /var) via libostree
  • Client-side package layering (and overrides)
  • Easily make your own derivatives

Projects using rpm-ostree

The OSTree project is independent of distributions and agnostic to how content is delivered and managed; it’s used today by e.g. Debian, Fedora, and OpenEmbedded derived systems among others. There are some examples in the OSTree github.

In contrast, rpm-ostree is intended to be tightly integrated with the Fedora ecosystem. Today it is the underlying update mechanism of Fedora CoreOS as well as its derivative RHEL CoreOS. It is also used by Fedora IoT and Fedora Silverblue.

Originally, it was productized as part of Project Atomic.

Getting started

If you want to try the system as a user, see the main Fedora website which has several versions that use rpm-ostree, including Silverblue, IoT and CoreOS. If you are interested in assembling your own systems, see compose server.


Package systems such as apt and yum are highly prevalent in Linux-based operating systems. They offer a lot of flexiblity, but have many failure modes.

The core premise of rpm-ostree is that offline transactional image-based updates should be the default. This provides a high degree of predictability and resiliency. The operating system vendor can focus a lot of effort on testing the “base images” as a unit.

Further, image based updates simply work better at scale. For “IoT” style devices it’s very inefficient to have each machine perform dependency resolution, run package scripts etc. And the same is true for many server datacenter use cases.

Where rpm-ostree is fairly unique in the ecosystem is supporting client-side package layering and overrides; deeply integrating RPM as an (optional) layer on top of OSTree.

A good way to think of package layering is recasting RPMs as “operating system extensions”, similar to how browser extensions work (although before those were sandboxed). One can use package layering for components not easily containerized, such as PAM modules, custom shells, etc.

Further, one can easily use rpm-ostree override replace to override the kernel or userspace components with the very same RPMs shipped to traditional systems. The Fedora project for example continues to only have one kernel build.

Layering and overrides are still built on top of the default OSTree engine - installing and updating client-side packages constructs a new filesystem root, it does not by default affect your booted root. This preserves the “image” nature of the system.

By its nature as a hybrid image/package system, rpm-ostree is intended to span nearly all use cases of current package systems and image systems.

Why would I want to use it?

One major feature rpm-ostree has over traditional package management is atomic upgrade/rollback. It supports a model where an OS vendor (such as CentOS or Fedora) can provide pre-assembled “base OS images”, and client systems can replicate those, and possibly layer on additional packages.

Why not implement these changes in an existing package manager?

The OSTree related projects section covers this to a degree. As soon as one starts taking “snapshots” or keeping track of multiple roots, it uncovers many issues. For example, which content specifically is rolled forward or backwards? If the package manager isn’t deeply aware of a snapshot tool, it’s easy to lose coherency.

Filesystem layout

A concrete example is that rpm-ostree moves the RPM database to /usr/share/rpm, since we want one per root /usr. In contrast, the snapper tool goes to some effort to include /var/lib/rpm in snapshots, but avoid rolling forward/back log files in /var/log.

OSTree requires clear rules around the semantics of directories like /usr and /var across upgrades, and while this requires changing some software, we believe the result is significantly more reliable than having two separate systems like yum and snapper glued together, or apt-get and BTRFS, etc.

User experience

Furthermore, beyond just the mechanics of things like the filesystem layout, the implemented upgrade model affects the entire user experience.

For example, the base system OSTree commits that one replicates from a remote server can be assigned version numbers. They are released as coherent wholes, tested together. If one is simply performing snapshots on the client side, every client machine can have different versions of components.

Related to this is that rpm-ostree clearly distinguishes which packages you have layered, and it’s easy to remove them, going back to a pristine, known state. Many package managers just implement a “bag of packages” model with no clear bases or layering. As the OS evolves over time, “package drift” occurs where you might have old, unused packages lying around.

But still evolutionary

On the other hand, rpm-ostree in other ways is very evolutionary. There have been many, many different package managers invented - why not adopt or build on one of those?

The answer here is that it takes a long time for tooling to be built on top of a package format - things like mirroring servers. Another example is source format representations - there are many, many tools that know how to build source RPMs.

From the perspective of distribution which has all of that ecosystem built up, rpm-ostree does introduce a new binary format (ostree), but otherwise includes an RPM database, and also operates on packages. It is not a new source format either.

Talks and media

A number of Project Atomic talks are available; see for example this post which has a bigger collection that also includes talks on containers.

rpm-ostree specific talks:


rpm-ostree includes code licensed under GPLv2+, LGPLv2+, (Apache 2.0 OR MIT). For more information, see LICENSE.